The importance of compliant warranty claim notices

Back in December we wrote about the importance of following the rules set out in an agreement when bringing a claim under that agreement. The buyer in that case found out to its detriment just how vital it is to follow the procedure set out in the agreement.

Recently the Court of Appeal considered the provisions of a share purchase agreement and upheld a decision that a buyer had failed to comply with the contractual requirements relating to a warranty claim.

Background

Teoco, the buyer, entered into a share purchase agreement (SPA) with Aircom, the seller, to acquire two companies in 2013. In August 2015, the buyer issued proceedings against the seller claiming damages for breach of warranty in relation to tax owed by two seller subsidiaries based in Brazil and the Philippines. The total tax liabilities were valued at £3.45 million.

The seller argued that the buyer had not given notice of the claims in accordance with the provisions of the SPA. The seller’s argument focused on two letters sent by the buyer’s solicitors to the seller in February 2015 and June 2015. The seller argued that both of these were insufficient to satisfy the contractual notice requirements.

The High Court struck out the buyer’s claim but the buyer then appealed that decision.

Share purchase agreement

The SPA included various warranties given by the seller, some of which related to the tax position of the two subsidiaries.

As is common practice, the SPA also included limitations on the seller’s liability under the warranties. In particular, a provision stated that the seller would not be liable for any claim unless the buyer had: “given notice to the seller of any claim setting out reasonable details of the claim (including the grounds on which it is based).”

The letters

The buyer’s first letter notifying the seller of the warranty claims, sent in February 2015, referred to “claims arising out of the tax warranties and the general warranties”, but reserved its position “as to which particular head of claim it would fall under”.

The letter was also ambiguous as it referred to “tax exposures which may exist”, “potential tax liabilities” and the “estimate of potential quantum”. The court said this was just a “generic reference to potential claims” and it did not set out the basis of the claims in reasonable detail.

Despite a second letter being sent in June 2015 containing additional information relating to the buyer’s claims, the High Court held that the letters did not comply with the wording of the SPA and they were not sufficiently detailed to constitute valid notification under the SPA.

The most important point for the court was that the letter did not identify the specific warranties in the SPA which the seller was alleged to have breached. This point was considered further in the Court of Appeal.

Click to view all articles for the EPIC:
Or click to view the full company profile:
    Facebook
    Twitter
    LinkedIn
    Gateley Holdings Plc

    More articles like this

    Hardman & Co

    Gateley Plc Excellent full-year results

    Gateley reported another strong set of results, again beating market expectations, underlining its consistency and predictable performance. A broad-based, legal and professional services group, Gateley is a leader in serving the UK mid-market. It continues to

    Gateley Holdings Plc

    Gateley Holdings plc Revenue up 20.1% to £46.4m

    Michael Ward, CEO of Gateley, said: “I am delighted with the performance of the business in the first half of the financial year. Our proven strong and resilient business model and our focused diversification strategy has

    Hardman & Co

    Gateley Plc Strong trading and industry opportunity

    Gateley Plc (LON:GTLY) trading statement in respect of 1H 2019 was sparkling, with 20% revenue growth in 1H and a highly confident outlook for 2H. We expect to revise our forecasts up by £2m at the

    Gateley Holdings Plc

    Gateley Holdings strong financial performance continues

    Commenting, Michael Ward, Chief Executive Officer of Gateley, said: “Our strong financial performance continues to enable the Board to invest in the future of the Group. It’s been a busy six months, including the acquisitions of

    Gateley Holdings Plc

    Gateley (Holdings) Plc Acquisition of Kiddy & Partners

    Commenting on the acquisition, Michael Ward, Chief Executive Officer of Gateley said: “This acquisition significantly broadens and strengthens our Employment and People Services offering. There will be clear opportunities for us to collaborate and deliver integrated

    Gateley Holdings Plc

    Gateley Holdings Plc Trading Update

    Gateley Holdings Plc (LON:GTLY), the national commercial law and complementary professional services group, has today announced an update on trading ahead of its audited results for the financial year ended 30 April 2018.   Trading in

    Gateley Holdings Plc

    NDAs: out of the shadows and into the spotlight

    Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are regularly used in business to keep matters such as financial information and sensitive trading data out of the public domain. In most M&A transactions the parties will enter into an

    Gateley Holdings Plc

    If the (compensation) cap doesn’t fit…

    Following a referral by the Court of Appeal to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), the Advocate General (the AG) has given her opinion on the application of Article 8 of the EU’s Insolvency Directive (the Directive) in

    Gateley Holdings Plc

    GATELEY APPOINTS NEW LEEDS OFFICE HEAD

    Listed law firm Gateley has appointed a new Leeds head, replacing the man who founded the office in 2012. Commercial dispute resolution (CDR) partner Andrew Johnson takes over from restructuring partner William Ballmann, who is reducing